shifted interest as well, but i might look at your code someday, tnx for not having the code get lost on your systems while you shift interest!
i'm a little curious, if you will, what was the complexity and danger you ran into?
and where has your interest shifted to?
Search found 82 matches
- Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:28 am
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: BarsWF gone opensource
- Replies: 14
- Views: 88965
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:29 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Distributed crypo-network discussion
- Replies: 204
- Views: 150190
Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion
fyi: opencrack uncracked list of something like 460k hashes drops to around 113 Mhashes
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:20 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Distributed crypo-network discussion
- Replies: 204
- Views: 150190
Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion
hehe, i'll leave such scary code up to you
(or your intel compiler
)
hmm... no idea if intel compiler will actually improve speed of my multi hash version... maybe i'll need to go and grab myself a trial version again


hmm... no idea if intel compiler will actually improve speed of my multi hash version... maybe i'll need to go and grab myself a trial version again
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:15 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Distributed crypo-network discussion
- Replies: 204
- Views: 150190
Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion
With a hash list of 200 000 hashes EmDebr is just falling back to around 119 Mhashes/s
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:06 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Distributed crypo-network discussion
- Replies: 204
- Views: 150190
Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion
oh btw, i have 3MB per core, so it's 12MB... you probably have the same, but dual core? i have a Q9450, running it at 3.2 GHz. For you information: I get like 200-210 Mhashes/s with BarsWF. brute forcer: http://blog.distracted.nl/2009/10/emdebr-05-multihash.html (this version actually has a couple o...
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:51 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Distributed crypo-network discussion
- Replies: 204
- Views: 150190
Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion
bars, how much cache is on your cpu?
cause i 'only' dropped to like 70-75% with multihash support (125M) on sse2 md5. Of course i started out with a somewhat lower single hash speed (175M), but still
p.s. i have 3MB L2 cache.
cause i 'only' dropped to like 70-75% with multihash support (125M) on sse2 md5. Of course i started out with a somewhat lower single hash speed (175M), but still

p.s. i have 3MB L2 cache.
- Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:00 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8023
Re: Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
DES is still on my wishlist, for cpu and for ps3... not sure if i'll ever do it though 

- Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:54 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Reversing the Last 7 Sub-Rounds of MD4
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6186
Re: Reversing the Last 7 Sub-Rounds of MD4
for ntlm cracking you can reverse full last round, just like with md5...
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:23 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, криптография, безопасность, GPGPU и суперкомпьютеры
- Topic: Sony PS3 и что то там от мелкомягких
- Replies: 15
- Views: 27460
Re: Sony PS3 и что то там от мелкомягких
он был бы очень неплохо, если бы можно было бы написать на английском языке, я бы с удовольствием говорят о PS3 кодирования 
(BabelFish не столь велика)

(BabelFish не столь велика)
- Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:57 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Simple Questions
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8447
Re: Simple Questions
windows gives you a warning if you try a password longer then 14 chars, stating it won't be compatible with older versions (like win98).
The result is that it'll store an empty LM hash.
The result is that it'll store an empty LM hash.
- Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:07 am
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Distributed crypo-network discussion
- Replies: 204
- Views: 150190
Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion
hey Bars, i'm always curious about what you are up to ;) would you mind sharing some specs about the upcoming salty cracker software? :) like: * how fast is it now that you are cracking multiple hashes? * will salty cracker clients support multi-gpu? * will there still be a cpu (sse) only version? *...
- Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:38 am
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: how can i optimized my program. who can help me.
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12195
Re: how can i optimized my program. who can help me.
http://www.freerainbowtables.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=715#p5763 http://3.14.by/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=47 the idea is that you keep part of your plaintext 'fixed' for a while, until you have tried all combinations in the flexible part (like [aaaa-zzzz]aaaa). then do the reversal steps again ...
- Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:35 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: How to crack Cisco IOS enable secret
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14649
Re: How to crack Cisco IOS enable secret
does that mean you are somehow involved with barswf development?Sc00bz wrote:not yet but it's planed

- Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:47 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
- Replies: 54
- Views: 56873
Re: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
for anyone interested, new EnTibr @ blog.distracted.nl, i guess the fastest public CPU NTLM brute forcer until Bars releases his 

- Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:47 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
- Replies: 54
- Views: 56873
Re: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
oh alright, great 
show me the crackers
or where to get them 

show me the crackers


- Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:25 am
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
- Replies: 54
- Views: 56873
Re: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
i don't think bars is currently actively developing his public cracking software :) but if you are bars, feel free to rip my interlaced (3x or 4x available) SSE2 NTLM code and use most if not all of it in barswf: http://blog.distracted.nl/2009/05/faster-brute-forcers.html i'm actually curious about ...
- Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:15 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8023
Re: Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
i have no idea what the new cell processor is...
- Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:10 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8023
Re: Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
i'm not sure how fast it could theoretically be... until anyone else makes a faster version we probably won't know :) Nick Breese started out with numbers like 1.400 and 1.900 Mhashes/s, but probably accidentally had the compiler optimize his actual md5 code away :p His last number was something lik...
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:03 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8023
Psebr, PlayStation 3 brute forcer!
I guess as this forum isn't as lively as it used to be, a little self promotion won't hurt and it might be of interest for some of the people around here :joy: http://blog.distracted.nl/2009/06/psebr-md5-playstation-3-md5-password.html Source code included, doing almost 300 Mhashes/s using 6 SPUs an...
- Fri May 15, 2009 10:23 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
- Replies: 54
- Views: 56873
Re: Request: NT Hash (actually MD4)
really?x4d3 wrote:Have some projects with short deadlines right now. But you can still expect the linux version sometime mid-December.

- Tue May 05, 2009 8:30 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: about the algorithm used
- Replies: 49
- Views: 37514
Re: about the algorithm used
hmm, 64KB indeed... i so have 3MB L2 cache per core though :p
maybe i'll try and get me an evaluation version for VC pro as well...
maybe i'll try and get me an evaluation version for VC pro as well...
- Tue May 05, 2009 6:14 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Algorithm optimizations (reversing steps)
- Replies: 19
- Views: 22527
Re: Algorithm optimizations (reversing steps)
read this one: http://www.freerainbowtables.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=715#p5763 and note the paragraph about brute forcing: "Brute forcing: data[09] in round 3: Last full step you need to do then check variable a (1 in 4 billion chance will need to do the next 3 steps). You hold all the data ch...
- Tue May 05, 2009 7:57 am
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: Algorithm optimizations (reversing steps)
- Replies: 19
- Views: 22527
Re: Algorithm optimizations (reversing steps)
hmm good point about the sorting... haven't written a multi hash brute forcer yet, so no experience with sorting large lists 

- Tue May 05, 2009 7:54 am
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: about the algorithm used
- Replies: 49
- Views: 37514
Re: about the algorithm used
i run 32 bit, and i think my cpu has a large cache... so that explains MD4... probably MD5 not going faster with 4 times interlacing because of the larger code then.
- Mon May 04, 2009 8:29 pm
- Forum: BarsWF, Cryptography, Security, GPGPU and supercomputing
- Topic: about the algorithm used
- Replies: 49
- Views: 37514
Re: about the algorithm used
Side note: I still don't understand how his 32 bit version is so fast interlacing 3 with SSE2 to me seems like it would be slower than interlacing SSE2 and MMX. Well I guess it has to do with cache (for interlacing 3 with SSE2) and/or that SSE2 and MMX have a performance hit such as with switching ...