3.14.by forum

shifted interest as well, but i might look at your code someday, tnx for not having the code get lost on your systems while you shift interest!
i'm a little curious, if you will, what was the complexity and danger you ran into?

and where has your interest shifted to?

fyi: opencrack uncracked list of something like 460k hashes drops to around 113 Mhashes

hehe, i'll leave such scary code up to you (or your intel compiler )
hmm... no idea if intel compiler will actually improve speed of my multi hash version... maybe i'll need to go and grab myself a trial version again

With a hash list of 200 000 hashes EmDebr is just falling back to around 119 Mhashes/s

oh btw, i have 3MB per core, so it's 12MB... you probably have the same, but dual core? i have a Q9450, running it at 3.2 GHz. For you information: I get like 200-210 Mhashes/s with BarsWF. brute forcer: http://blog.distracted.nl/2009/10/emdebr-05-multihash.html (this version actually has a couple o...

bars, how much cache is on your cpu?
cause i 'only' dropped to like 70-75% with multihash support (125M) on sse2 md5. Of course i started out with a somewhat lower single hash speed (175M), but still

p.s. i have 3MB L2 cache.

DES is still on my wishlist, for cpu and for ps3... not sure if i'll ever do it though

for ntlm cracking you can reverse full last round, just like with md5...

он был бы очень неплохо, если бы можно было бы написать на английском языке, я бы с удовольствием говорят о PS3 кодирования
(BabelFish не столь велика)

windows gives you a warning if you try a password longer then 14 chars, stating it won't be compatible with older versions (like win98).
The result is that it'll store an empty LM hash.

hey Bars, i'm always curious about what you are up to ;) would you mind sharing some specs about the upcoming salty cracker software? :) like: * how fast is it now that you are cracking multiple hashes? * will salty cracker clients support multi-gpu? * will there still be a cpu (sse) only version? *...

http://www.freerainbowtables.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=715#p5763 http://3.14.by/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=47 the idea is that you keep part of your plaintext 'fixed' for a while, until you have tried all combinations in the flexible part (like [aaaa-zzzz]aaaa). then do the reversal steps again ...

Sc00bz wrote:not yet but it's planed

does that mean you are somehow involved with barswf development?

for anyone interested, new EnTibr @ blog.distracted.nl, i guess the fastest public CPU NTLM brute forcer until Bars releases his

oh alright, great
show me the crackers or where to get them

i don't think bars is currently actively developing his public cracking software :) but if you are bars, feel free to rip my interlaced (3x or 4x available) SSE2 NTLM code and use most if not all of it in barswf: http://blog.distracted.nl/2009/05/faster-brute-forcers.html i'm actually curious about ...

i have no idea what the new cell processor is...

i'm not sure how fast it could theoretically be... until anyone else makes a faster version we probably won't know :) Nick Breese started out with numbers like 1.400 and 1.900 Mhashes/s, but probably accidentally had the compiler optimize his actual md5 code away :p His last number was something lik...

I guess as this forum isn't as lively as it used to be, a little self promotion won't hurt and it might be of interest for some of the people around here :joy: http://blog.distracted.nl/2009/06/psebr-md5-playstation-3-md5-password.html Source code included, doing almost 300 Mhashes/s using 6 SPUs an...

x4d3 wrote:Have some projects with short deadlines right now. But you can still expect the linux version sometime mid-December.

really?

hmm, 64KB indeed... i so have 3MB L2 cache per core though :p

maybe i'll try and get me an evaluation version for VC pro as well...

read this one: http://www.freerainbowtables.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=715#p5763 and note the paragraph about brute forcing: "Brute forcing: data[09] in round 3: Last full step you need to do then check variable a (1 in 4 billion chance will need to do the next 3 steps). You hold all the data ch...

hmm good point about the sorting... haven't written a multi hash brute forcer yet, so no experience with sorting large lists

i run 32 bit, and i think my cpu has a large cache... so that explains MD4... probably MD5 not going faster with 4 times interlacing because of the larger code then.

Side note: I still don't understand how his 32 bit version is so fast interlacing 3 with SSE2 to me seems like it would be slower than interlacing SSE2 and MMX. Well I guess it has to do with cache (for interlacing 3 with SSE2) and/or that SSE2 and MMX have a performance hit such as with switching ...