3.14.by forum

Lol, you should read the paper though.

They had to *guess* the serial number of the certs they bought to do it.

I think they spent over $1000 of cert buying to do it.

Nope, that's nowhere near the record.

http://blog.red-database-security.com/2 ... cer-barswf

3611.81 MHash/sec

Yep, I was just watching Hak5, and lo and behold, your tool was used...

http://www.hak5.org/episodes/episode-419

Just in case you notice a large large steep hill in the bandwidth chart.

They also linked to the NTLM multi-hash cracker that bitweasel made. (They linked the thread...)

Does this mean you'll finally get to work on the distributed version?



Performance on the 4870 seems to surpass the equivalent nvidia cards by far...

i know that this post is not for this topic, but i would like this change will be aplicated to the future versions. more hash in md5 are compose by a keyword that we know + password. md5(keyword+pass) blah blah blah blah blah. It's called a salt. And yes, it *will* be in it eventually. (Not sure, b...

BarsMonster wrote:Can someone please explain what is exact difference between Unix MD5 and Freebsd MD5?

None!

They're even stored in the same format on freebsd. (Just in a different file than other Unix distros. I think it's /etc/master.passwd on freebsd)

So just look at my earlier post.

clearly ntlm and unix(md5) ! added ntlm. Unix md5 - is that what I call freebsd md5? (the one with 1000 itterations) It's the same apparently. Just the same old crypt() library function. (Check Section 3 of your Unix manual!) The crypt() algo used for the shadow file's "MD5" is similiar to MD5, but...

Less talk, more code!

*cracks whip*

80 teraflops should be easy.

Theres not much info considering that the current version of the rar spec is proprietry. The latest I can find is only 2.02, and that's not even close to when they started rolling out AES in the files. (It was RAR 3.0 when AES was introduced.) You can find it here: http://www.wotsit.org/list.asp?fc=...

Err, does this mean the current code you were working on is.. gone?

ok one last time: there is no such thing as WPA rainbowtables! Yeah, the master key uses the SSID as a seed I believe, so even if we did have enough computing power to generate a table, you'd need one for every different SSID. And before someone mentions the church of wifi's "tables", they're just ...

Those i7's are a dead-end line. They change to a different socket for the one after it, IIRC.

the_drag0n wrote:yeah that is called dvb-t in germany and it totally sucks!
the quality is realy bad and there are only 16 channels i think.

Only?

I can barely count 10 channels with different content in Australia. (Yet, that's still more than our analogue channels.)

On an 8800 GTX, with a big hashlist, it gets checkrates up around 20B or a bit higher, depending on the length. Am I reading that right? 20 BILLION hashes per second? You should only be doing like... ~400 million, then again, that's with BarsWF's 0.1 tool... It's compiled for 64-bit Linux. Aww shuc...

Mmm, but you should do the same format as other tools...

Eg. Inside a .md5 file...
(The Elcomsoft software takes it in this format at least.)

And of course, an initial check to deal with the duplicate ones!

Well, I get around 6200 per second with a 9800GT... (Same as a 8800GT, but with different bios)

The problem is, it's only bruteforce. Theres no dictionary option for WPA in at the moment.

It sort of bottlenecks at exactly 6199 for some reason.