How high can you get

the_drag0n · Post by **the_drag0n** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:45 am

just 30% ? i think 30% is a LOT for just using another os...

Rolf · Post by **Rolf** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:42 pm

the_drag0n wrote:just 30% ? i think 30% is a LOT for just using another os...

Hell yes

protter · Post by **protter** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:48 pm

the_drag0n wrote:just 30% ? i think 30% is a LOT for just using another os...

In my understanding GPU provides better performance than CPU. Actually, a CPU's register/bus width increasing by 2 shall provide better performance than 30%. It is a question of SW implementation.

Post by **BarsMonster** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:25 pm

protter wrote:
the_drag0n wrote:just 30% ? i think 30% is a LOT for just using another os...
In my understanding GPU provides better performance than CPU. Actually, a CPU's register/bus width increasing by 2 shall provide better performance than 30%. It is a question of SW implementation.

Actually, that is quite far from truth

I am not working with usual CPU registers, only with SSE2 ones. They are the same for both 32 & 64-bit mode (128 bit). Most of data is stored inside of processor in registers.
The problem is that in 64-bit mode there are twice more SSE2 registers, so that L1 cache is far less used = that give the performance difference.

phreak9i6 · Post by **phreak9i6** » Tue Jan 06, 2009 10:53 pm

I love this app!

Intel i7 Core 940 w/ dual BFG GTX280 OC.

Vista x64

the_drag0n · Post by **the_drag0n** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:09 am

could you try without HT and tell us the results ? also what is it clocked to in this moment ? 4GHz ?

N0S · Post by **N0S** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:10 pm

I made an little overview to compare the cpu/gpus.
I didn't/won't include SLI/Crossfire results.

Post by **BarsMonster** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:22 pm

N0S wrote:I made an little overview to compare the cpu/gpus.
I didn't/won't include SLI/Crossfire results.

Thanks, impressive work

the_drag0n · Post by **the_drag0n** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:40 pm

hmm phenoms are missing

phenom 9550 overclocked to 2,60Ghz @ 64 Bit 34M per core 134 Total.

also my gpu: 9600Gt normal clocked (650Mhz) 172M (lol

)

: gpu not overclocked; unclocked.gif (9.51 KiB) Viewed 16118 times

@ 954MHz: 258M ...

: gpu overclocked; clocked.gif (9.71 KiB) Viewed 16117 times

now i wonder if bars could write some testing app which checks the stability and wether the results are right ? id be nice to test dunno like 1 billion hashes for there correct creation

Post by **BarsMonster** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:53 pm

Yes, there going to be massive tests before 1.0 release, we are going to find several mils of hashes in distributed testing

Post by **BarsMonster** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:13 pm

OMG

That is the record

Found this on waraxe forum

phreak9i6 · Post by **phreak9i6** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:54 pm

I was clocked at normal clock rate, 2.8 something ghz on the i7-940

mrb · Post by **mrb** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:59 am

BarsMonster wrote: OMG That is the record
Found this on waraxe forum

Too bad he didn't say what the hw was. I'd say maybe an 8-socket Opteon 8378 (given the 30 Mhash/s per core).

Spaztikdude · Post by **Spaztikdude** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:06 am

Nope, that's nowhere near the record.

http://blog.red-database-security.com/2 ... cer-barswf

3611.81 MHash/sec

the_drag0n · Post by **the_drag0n** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:48 am

ment is a number of cpu record. its 32 cores.. prob amd opterons. the question is are those quad or hexacores ?

Post by **BarsMonster** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:26 pm

This is defenetly a leader

This is from bugreport, guy used mix of 8.11 & 8.12 drivers, so that all Brook+ kernel calls were not executed actually

asl · Post by **asl** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:41 pm

42357.73 MHash/sec

woa that would be nice

the_drag0n · Post by **the_drag0n** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:44 pm

i was like lol wtf w000t ?

protter · Post by **protter** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:02 pm

Intel i7 920, GTX 280, Win 7 64 bit OS - GPU works faster than on Vista 64 bit OS

c4p0ne · Post by **c4p0ne** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:19 pm

8 cores?

.... What is that the "hyperthreading" at work that Intel brought back to the i7?

Post by **BarsMonster** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:21 pm

Still want to see i7 with HT on and off in 64-bit mode

Post by **BarsMonster** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:37 pm

Anyone with Phenom II?

the_drag0n · Post by **the_drag0n** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 am

yeah phenom II and gtx 295 would be interesting

knapish · Post by **knapish** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:54 pm

BarsMonster wrote:This is defenetly a leader

This is from bugreport, guy used mix of 8.11 & 8.12 drivers, so that all Brook+ kernel calls were not executed actually

it it still working if the cal failed? cause i get kinda high also

http://3.14.by/forum/download/file.php?mode=view&id=32

remo · Post by **remo** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:41 pm

knapisch which card oo? wtf:D

got 1.1-1.2kkk hash/s whit 4870 1gb not oced

but.. b4 i got arroung 200m and more with my q9550 @3.4

now i only get 100m? bug?

3.14.by forum

How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Re: How high can you get

Who is online