Distributed crypo-network discussion

DarkPrince · Post by **DarkPrince** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:45 pm

Phase 3: a little more distant near future (~mid-end August) - starting production run on submitted MD5 hashes

about 30% left of August, is it time soon

LordMike · Post by **LordMike** » Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:04 pm

Free Rainbow Tables have a list too:
http://www.freerainbowtables.com/en/hashcracking/

K.9 · Post by **K.9** » Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:33 pm

Are you still developing the hash cracker?

DarkPrince · Post by **DarkPrince** » Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:48 am

I can't sit on my hands anymore! :'(

Let's go!

D3ad0ne · Post by **D3ad0ne** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:19 pm

Do you have an update on this or are you looking for beta testers?

DarkPrince · Post by **DarkPrince** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:24 pm

Phase 3: a little more distant near future (~mid-end August) - starting production run on submitted MD5 hashes

Status update please

please

Tal · Post by **Tal** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:26 pm

Maybe it was a typo and was supposed to be "mid-end sept" ?

Post by **BarsMonster** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:34 pm

Tal wrote:Maybe it was a typo and was supposed to be "mid-end sept" ?

Well, things are moving around my work slowly

Sometimes I regret that left office and started to work at home

Right now everything is migrated to a dedicated server, I decided to not wait when shared hoster would ask me to quit

LordMike · Post by **LordMike** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:57 pm

BarsMonster wrote:
Tal wrote:Maybe it was a typo and was supposed to be "mid-end sept" ?
Well, things are moving around my work slowly Sometimes I regret that left office and started to work at home
Right now everything is migrated to a dedicated server, I decided to not wait when shared hoster would ask me to quit

lol

Post by **BarsMonster** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:32 pm

LordMike wrote:Free Rainbow Tables have a list too:
http://www.freerainbowtables.com/en/hashcracking/

These are in now. 442491 total

Better than I've though. In my nightmares I've seen 20 million lists

DarkPrince · Post by **DarkPrince** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:08 pm

BarsMonster wrote:
LordMike wrote:Free Rainbow Tables have a list too:
http://www.freerainbowtables.com/en/hashcracking/
These are in now. 442491 total Better than I've though. In my nightmares I've seen 20 million lists

So a new start date soon? :O

LordMike · Post by **LordMike** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:19 pm

So your'e actually preparing work for clients.. And hoping the work won't end soon?..

neinbrucke · Post by **neinbrucke** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:07 am

hey Bars, i'm always curious about what you are up to

would you mind sharing some specs about the upcoming salty cracker software?

like:

* how fast is it now that you are cracking multiple hashes?
* will salty cracker clients support multi-gpu?
* will there still be a cpu (sse) only version?
* are you still using hash reversing, or did it make things slower when cracking so many hashes simultaneously?
* any word on when you'll support other algorithms then md5?

DarkPrince · Post by **DarkPrince** » Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:30 pm

BarsMonster wrote:
Tal wrote:Maybe it was a typo and was supposed to be "mid-end sept" ?
Well, things are moving around my work slowly Sometimes I regret that left office and started to work at home
Right now everything is migrated to a dedicated server, I decided to not wait when shared hoster would ask me to quit

Update, Update, Update, Update, Update, Update, Update, Update, Update, Update, Update Me!

DarkPrince · Post by **DarkPrince** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:39 am

LordMike · Post by **LordMike** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:15 pm

Bars. What exactly are you doing now?... Which part (Website, DB, BarsWF, ..)?..

Interested.

Post by **BarsMonster** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:43 pm

LordMike wrote:Bars. What exactly are you doing now?... Which part (Website, DB, BarsWF, ..)?..
Interested.

Currently it's BarsWF itself, code became quite fragile after massive refactoring and these new libraries to make it cross-platform.

LordMike · Post by **LordMike** » Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:32 pm

BarsMonster wrote:
LordMike wrote:Bars. What exactly are you doing now?... Which part (Website, DB, BarsWF, ..)?..
Interested.
Currently it's BarsWF itself, code became quite fragile after massive refactoring and these new libraries to make it cross-platform.

Hmm... Well, that's respectable

Maybe a beta/distributed soon?
I think that even with 'only' the 440 000 hashes in queue, it's a considerable
amount (Unless your app requires larger counts)... And could be run tests on

K.9 · Post by **K.9** » Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:14 am

Im sure more users will add their hashes when the cracker started.

D3ad0ne · Post by **D3ad0ne** » Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:49 am

Actually was just thinking about this. Seems like it is going to be a major draw back that you won't be able to add hashes in once it is started. Who would want to wait weeks to have their hashes cracked? I understand the reason why it is not really possible because everyone is going to get the same set of hashes to crack and each person is going to be doing a different section of the keyspace. But it would be neat if there was a constant progression of users that always start from the beginning of the keyspace so that new hashes could always be added. Then once a hash has cycled through a whole keyspace it is taken out of the hash list and considered not crackable.

Post by **BarsMonster** » Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:20 am

D3ad0ne wrote:Actually was just thinking about this. Seems like it is going to be a major draw back that you won't be able to add hashes in once it is started. Who would want to wait weeks to have their hashes cracked? I understand the reason why it is not really possible because everyone is going to get the same set of hashes to crack and each person is going to be doing a different section of the keyspace. But it would be neat if there was a constant progression of users that always start from the beginning of the keyspace so that new hashes could always be added. Then once a hash has cycled through a whole keyspace it is taken out of the hash list and considered not crackable.

Well, no need to wait

Anyone would be able to start his task at any time, if he would assign priority higher than priority of current task

Post by **BarsMonster** » Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:21 am

LordMike wrote:
BarsMonster wrote:
LordMike wrote:Bars. What exactly are you doing now?... Which part (Website, DB, BarsWF, ..)?..
Interested.
Currently it's BarsWF itself, code became quite fragile after massive refactoring and these new libraries to make it cross-platform.
Hmm... Well, that's respectable

Maybe a beta/distributed soon?
I think that even with 'only' the 440 000 hashes in queue, it's a considerable
amount (Unless your app requires larger counts)... And could be run tests on

Well, last days I am totally in BarsWF, so after I would finish with problems like this http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=109873
We might see something working

Post by **BarsMonster** » Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:14 am

After a very long period of broken state, it just found password again on CUDA

Had to apply uncountable workarounds...

Crs · Post by **Crs** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:27 pm

Hello,
Looking forward to see this software released.
I've been watching your site for some time now, and I can't wait anymore

OCP · Post by **OCP** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:45 am

Do you have an approximate time you expect the project to go live? I see from the first post here, it has been over a year of discussion.
Is it going to be up in days? weeks? months? year? Just curious,
Thanks

3.14.by forum

Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Re: Distributed crypo-network discussion

Who is online