New codebase testing 0.B version

[BarsMonster]

Array length?

Just my guess

You are totally right

[Sc00bz]

Wouldn't it make more sense to dynamically allocate the necessary number of threads?
Then you can say "no limit" or more correctly "limited by hardware, drivers and/or operating system."

[BarsMonster]

Wouldn't it make more sense to dynamically allocate the necessary number of threads?
Then you can say "no limit" or more correctly "limited by hardware, drivers and/or operating system."

I prefer to use static variables when possible
When 128-GPU systems would be a routine, I'll rewrite it for sure

[LordMike]

Wouldn't it make more sense to dynamically allocate the necessary number of threads?
Then you can say "no limit" or more correctly "limited by hardware, drivers and/or operating system."

I prefer to use static variables when possible
When 128-GPU systems would be a routine, I'll rewrite it for sure

NVidias cloud will be your worst nightmare!!..

[DarkPrince]

When i try to use Custom charset it takes a-z and A-Z

[kiando]

Works very nice. Thank you for the x32 version. (still keeping this up for compatibility with other programs)

[DarkPrince]

When i try to use Custom charset it takes a-z and A-Z

http://www.speedyshare.com/537316491.html

[BarsMonster]

When i try to use Custom charset it takes a-z and A-Z

http://www.speedyshare.com/537316491.html

So what's the problem?

[DarkPrince]

When i try to use Custom charset it takes a-z and A-Z

http://www.speedyshare.com/537316491.html

So what's the problem?

-C [ --custom_characters ] arg?

shouldnt -C abc only use a, b and c then? And not all lower and capital chars?

[BarsMonster]

shouldnt -C abc only use a, b and c then? And not all lower and capital chars?

Could you copy command line parameters here, because video quality is quite crappy

[DarkPrince]

-h 11111111111111111111111111111111 -C abc

[D3ad0ne]

I've noticed that this version will freeze sometime when you first start it. A couple of CPU's will show numbers then it will just say 100%. But I have noticed that it is a bit faster than the other versions.

I just got in to the 6 B's

[BarsMonster]

I've noticed that this version will freeze sometime when you first start it. A couple of CPU's will show numbers then it will just say 100%. But I have noticed that it is a bit faster than the other versions.

I just got in to the 6 B's

6K.JPG

Does it hang forever or for a couple of seconds?
Nice speed

[D3ad0ne]

Well I've let it sit there for a while and it won't do anything else. The cpu load is all nominal even on the ones that have numbers. I usually have to kill it or sometimes it will respond to Esc, then it will say stopping threads then not do anything again.

I finally installed 64bit, so this is the 64 bit version.

Nice speed

Thanks, this is on my new P6T7 WS supercomputer MB I just got in, with 4 X GTX 295s

[BarsMonster]

Well I've let it sit there for a while and it won't do anything else. The cpu load is all nominal even on the ones that have numbers. I usually have to kill it or sometimes it will respond to Esc, then it will say stopping threads then not do anything again.

I see, how often does this reproduces? Could you send me the log file?

[D3ad0ne]

It does it about 5 out of 10 times I run the exe, this is the only version that I have noticed that does it.
Here is a screen shot of what it looks like when it does it:

froze.JPG (42.91 KiB) Viewed 37006 times

Here is the log:

Code: Select all

2009-11-12 18:27:11.0 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:------------------------------
2009-11-12 18:27:11.0 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:BarsWF started
2009-11-12 18:27:11.0 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init SSE2
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init Display
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#0
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#1
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#3
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#5
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#7
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #0
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #1
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #3
2009-11-12 18:27:11.2 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #5
2009-11-12 18:27:11.2 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #7
2009-11-12 18:27:11.2 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#0
2009-11-12 18:27:11.2 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#1
2009-11-12 18:27:11.2 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#3
2009-11-12 18:27:11.2 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#5
2009-11-12 18:27:11.2 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#7
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#6
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#4
2009-11-12 18:27:11.1 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:CUDA thread start GPU#2
2009-11-12 18:27:11.3 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #6
2009-11-12 18:27:11.3 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #4
2009-11-12 18:27:11.3 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Init CUDA thread #2
2009-11-12 18:27:11.4 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:State saved.
2009-11-12 18:27:11.4 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#0 Time spent: 62.500
2009-11-12 18:27:11.4 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#0 New amount of work per kernel: 30 : 512
2009-11-12 18:27:11.5 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#1 Time spent: 62.500
2009-11-12 18:27:11.5 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#1 New amount of work per kernel: 30 : 512
2009-11-12 18:27:11.6 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#5 Time spent: 62.500
2009-11-12 18:27:11.6 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#5 New amount of work per kernel: 30 : 512
2009-11-12 18:27:11.6 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#2
2009-11-12 18:27:11.6 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#4
2009-11-12 18:27:11.6 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:Detecting CUDA performance for GPU#6
2009-11-12 18:27:11.7 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#7 Time spent: 93.750
2009-11-12 18:27:11.7 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#7 New amount of work per kernel: 30 : 512
2009-11-12 18:27:11.8 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#3 Time spent: 62.500
2009-11-12 18:27:11.8 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#3 New amount of work per kernel: 30 : 512
2009-11-12 18:27:11.8 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#2 Time spent: 62.500
2009-11-12 18:27:11.8 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#2 New amount of work per kernel: 30 : 512
2009-11-12 18:27:11.9 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#4 Time spent: 46.875
2009-11-12 18:27:11.9 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#4 New amount of work per kernel: 60 : 512
2009-11-12 18:27:11.9 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#6 Time spent: 62.500
2009-11-12 18:27:12.0 MASTERX[2128]:BarsWF:I:GPU#6 New amount of work per kernel: 30 : 512

[BarsMonster]

Could you please verify reproducibility with --min_len 6 or 8?

[easteregg]

thanks! finally my system with one 8800GT and on8400GS is working

Code: Select all

╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ BarsWF MD5 bruteforcer v0.B ♥       http://3.14.by/en/md5 ║
║ by Svarychevski Michail             http://3.14.by/ru/md5 ║
╟───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╢
║   GPU0 :  391.12 MHash/sec    CPU0 :   40.61 MHash/sec    ║
║   GPU1 :   34.94 MHash/sec    CPU1 :   28.46 MHash/sec    ║
║                               CPU2 :   45.54 MHash/sec    ║
║                               CPU3 :   43.77 MHash/sec    ║
║                               CPU4 :   36.67 MHash/sec    ║
║                               CPU5 :   41.05 MHash/sec    ║
║                               CPU6 :   42.96 MHash/sec    ║
║                               CPU7 :   33.58 MHash/sec    ║
║                                                           ║
║   GPU* :  426.06 MHash/sec    CPU* :  312.65 MHash/sec    ║
╟───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╢
║ Key: nlIbvdU              Avg.Total:  738.71 MHash/sec    ║
║ Hash:1b0e9fd3086d90a159a1d6cb86f11b4c                     ║
║ Progress: 16.42 % ETC    0 days  0 hours 19 min 23 sec    ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

[Reelix]

How do you have 8 cores.... ?

Do you have 1 or 2 processors in there? o_O

[BarsMonster]

How do you have 8 cores.... ?

Do you have 1 or 2 processors in there? o_O

I bet it's i7 with HT on

But we had here some screen shots with 24 physical cores

[Rolf]

It's HT with 8 virtual cores.Looks really nice.

[LordMike]

How do you have 8 cores.... ?

Do you have 1 or 2 processors in there? o_O

I bet it's i7 with HT on

Isn't HT bad.. In general?..
I have it on my P4.. Can't really find a use for it.. Except that Sins of A Solar Empire
is running slower than usual due to it only using one core (Tops at 50% CPU usage... -.-)

[BarsMonster]

How do you have 8 cores.... ?

Do you have 1 or 2 processors in there? o_O

I bet it's i7 with HT on

Isn't HT bad.. In general?..
I have it on my P4.. Can't really find a use for it.. Except that Sins of A Solar Empire
is running slower than usual due to it only using one core (Tops at 50% CPU usage... -.-)

For some applications it does help, especially i7's HT.
For BarsWF it does help a little at i7.

[LordMike]

For some applications it does help, especially i7's HT.
For BarsWF it does help a little at i7.

But why.. ?
All I know that it does, is split the core 'theoretically' into two, presenting it as duo.. All calculations have to be done one one core anyways....

[easteregg]

youre all wrong. its a dual quad opteron system with 8 cores at shanghaibasis running with 3,2ghz
-> http://siginfo.de/vcards/showPC/1-default-pc.html